and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces.

JackHammer


Archive for the ‘Lord's Supper’


Cup of the New Testament 0

Posted on June 19, 2007 by Jeff Voegtlin

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. ~~Genesis 3:15

And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed. ~~Genesis 12:2-3

And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee. ~~Genesis 17:7

Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. ~~Galatians 3:16

For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. ~~Romans 10:4

That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. ~~Romans 10:9-12

After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. ~~1 Corinthians 11:25

The Lord’s Supper should be a thankful celebration of our Substitute’s victory on our behalf. It is a remembrance of the freedom we gained in the New Testament. A Testament sealed with His blood.

Communion 11

Posted on June 11, 2007 by Jeff Voegtlin

The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?

1 Corinthians 10 16

In this verse we see the name I’ve heard most commonly used for the Lord’s Supper: Communion. The word communion carries with it the ideas of fellowship and participation. When we celebrate the Lord’s Supper, we remember Christ’s work on our behalf, and in a sense, fellowship in his sufferings and participate in his death and subsequent victory. His Supper is the communion of the body of Christ.

Now I think it is important that we recognize not only our fellowship with His physical sufferings in some way, but also our fellowship with His body that we can see right now — the church. Communion is the fellowship and participation of the church as it remembers the work of Christ in His death, burial, resurrection and triumphant ascension. This is one reason why we don’t bring communion to people that are not at church. That’s not communion. You have to have an assembly in order to have participation with one another in fellowship.

This is another reason why the Lord’s Supper is necessary for the health of a church. As we partake, we ought to discern the Lord’s body around us. His body that we are a part of. His body that we have mistreated, or slandered, or envied. If we come to His table with these sins in our lives, we should immediately confess and forsake them. We should right them. If we have this understanding of the Lord’s Supper, the more often we partake, the healthier the body will be. This confessing and forsaking is true self-denial, maybe even taking up our cross.

For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord’s death til He come.

The Lord’s Table is His supper celebrated with thanksgiving in communion with other believers because of our fellowship in Christ. We show loyalty to the Lord as we remember His broken body and shed blood, which washes away our sin.

Bread, Part 3 1

Posted on September 29, 2006 by Dave Mallinak

Bread Cart 

The message completed, the deacons prepare the table for the Supper. It is a serious time, though not a sad time. We seriously rejoice. We celebrate solemnly. The table is prepared. One blesses the bread, already broken, prepared in the plate. The silver plates filled with bread are distributed to the deacons. They pass the plates. It is an offering of sorts. Not a collection, but an offering. Bread offered to the people. The people receive the bread, they take it, and hold it in their hand. The deacons return the plates. I look. Bread still fills the plate.

God filled His Word with bread. This should not surprise us. An exhaustive study of bread in the Bible reveals an exhausting amount of bread. And bread stories too. Bread stories fill the Word. The bread stories are not isolated, disjointed, random, or coincidental. Together, they form the grand story of our bread, the One Bread. Like manna in the wilderness, he that gathers little has no lack, and he that gathers much has nothing over.

God provides bread. Melchizedek met Abram, returning from the slaughter of the kings, with bread and wine. This was not the Lord’s Supper. Nor was it the first time bread was mentioned. Bread was first mentioned with the curse. In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground. If a man will not work, he also should not eat.

So, man sweats, and God provides bread. God provided Egypt with bread. God took a Hebrew boy from his father’s house. Through treachery, God made him a slave. God sent that Hebrew slave to a great man’s house. Through treachery, God put him in prison. God caused men to dream, and the prisoner to interpret. One man died, the other lived, and forgot. Until God reminded him. God reminded the man at the perfect time. The Hebrew slave became Egyptian lord. Second in command. Over Potiphar, and his wife. And by that lord, Israel ate bread. Egypt came to the Hebrew lord, seeking bread. They sold themselves to him for bread. God provides bread.

Then came a day when a new king rose up, that knew not Joseph. Joseph’s people were sold into slavery. Miraculously, God delivered them. On the eve of their deliverance, God instructed the people to eat bread. Unleavened bread. With the flesh of a lamb, and bitter herbs. They ate the bread, and they were delivered. And as a memorial, they ate the feast again each year. This was not the Lord’s Supper. Nor was it unrelated.

God provides bread. God gave manna in the wilderness. Israel doubted. They said, can God furnish a table in the wilderness? God can. God did. God already had. Man did eat angel’s food. God had rained down manna upon them to eat, and had given them of the corn of heaven. And Moses said unto them, This is the bread which the LORD hath given you to eat. He that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little had no lack; they gathered every man according to his eating. God gave manna with a purpose. God taught the people with the manna. Lesson number one:

Man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.

God gave them the Sabbath. And therefore on the sixth day, they gathered the bread of two days. God gave rest, and God gave bread. Man rested, and was fed. Manna fed man, but manna was not that bread from heaven. The Father gives us the true bread from heaven.

The priests put bread on the table. Hallowed bread. Consecrated bread. The Bread of the Presence. They called it shewbread. Twelve loaves, baked fresh. Baked every Sabbath. The priests profaned the Sabbath, and were blameless. The priests eat the old bread. But not always. Once, David and his men were hungry. The priest had no common bread to give. So, the priest gave the hallowed bread to David. And for this crime, the priest gave his life. He died for David, at the hand of King Saul. But it was no crime. The bread God gives does cost something.

Gideon was bread. A cake of barley bread. That cake of barley bread tumbled into the host of Midian, and came unto a tent, and smote it that it fell, and overturned it, that the tent lay along. Bread can be dangerous. The One Bread is. God bakes dangerous bread.

God provides bread miraculously. Ask Elijah. When there was not bread to be had, the ravens brought him bread. When the brook dried up, God sent Elijah to a widow. God commanded her to sustain him. So, Elijah asked a poor widow to use her last handful of meal to feed him. She was gathering two sticks. She and her son would eat and die. Elijah asked for that bread, their last bread, promising that the barrel of meal shall not waste, neither shall the cruse of oil fail, until the day that the LORD sendeth rain upon the earth.

God provides a continuous supply of bread. We will never stop eating bread. God provides an abundant supply. A boy brings his five loaves to Christ. In Christ’s hand, the loaves come alive. He blessed, and brake, and gave the loaves to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude. The multitude ate, and was filled. And they took up of the fragments that remained twelve baskets full.

God provides a continuous supply. God provides a miraculous supply. God provides an abundant supply. God takes the children’s bread, and casts it unto dogs. God provides a heavenly supply. Christ is the giver of bread. Christ is the Bread Given. The One Bread. And the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. The first mention of bread is with the curse. But then, there is blessing.

The plate is passed, the people receive. Scripture is read, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. The people take. They eat. They are fed. And the plate remains full.

Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

You can partake of the bread of the Lord’s Table, and still not eat the Living Bread. But those who have eaten the Living Bread will hunger for the bread at His Table. Nor will they stop. Not in this life, not in the next. Lord, evermore give us this bread. Blessed is he that shall eat bread in the Kingdom of God!

Reception of the Elements 0

Posted on September 27, 2006 by Kent Brandenburg

The two elements of the Lord’s Table are bread and cup. We know that the bread represents Christ’s broken body and that the grape juice symbolizes His shed blood. Does the “broken body” get a whole lot of coverage in Scripture? What’s the point? I contend that “broken body” or bread is substitutionary death and that “shed blood” or cup is sacrificially shed blood. Jesus couldn’t just bleed; neither could He only die in some non-bloody way, like strangulation. Both were necessary. The blood was not a mere metonym[1] for death and the Lord’s Supper reminds us of that. This fits with Colossians 1:20-22 (applied phrases highlighted):

And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven. And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:

The Lord Jesus Christ reconciled us to God by means of “the blood of the cross” and “the body of his flesh through death.” The second is not just a restatement, but a separate mandatory aspect of the work of Christ at Calvary. Our salvation depends both on His death and His shed blood as two entities within the same work of the Lord.

Several different types of wounds were opened upon Jesus’ body for Him to bleed profusely. They scourged Him with the cruel cat-of-nine-tails[2] (Mt. 27:26; Mk. 15:15; Jn. 19:1), pierced His precious head with the hard, sharp, Palestinian crown of thorns (Mt. 27:29; Mk. 15:17; Jn. 19:2, 5), struck His beautiful face with hard punches (Lk. 22:64), pounded those railroad spike-type nails into His hands (Jn. 20:25; Col. 2:14), and gashed His side with a deadly, Roman spear (Jn. 19:34). These details reveal the bloody sacrifice of Jesus Christ, for “without shedding of blood is no remission” (Heb. 9:22). His blood washes away (Rev. 1:5) and cleanses (1 John 1:7) sin.

“Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures” (1 Cor. 15:3). He “died for all” (2 Cor. 5:15). Hebrews 9:16, 17 says:

For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

Shed blood is necessary. Death is necessary. We take the cup and we take the bread.

And when we receive these separate elements into our bodies through our mouths and then into our digestive systems, what do they do? Putting the bread of the Table into our bodies through our mouths and drinking the juice of His Supper into our bellies through our lips testify of an ongoing reception of Him and everything that He is.

When the Passover was observed, as part of the ceremony the master of the feast offered the sop to those at the table. The sop was a piece of bread dipped in a special sauce. By accepting and then eating the sop, the one at the Table declared his reception of the coming Messiah.  It was at that very point of those proceedings that Satan entered Judas and he went out to betray the Lord Jesus Christ (John 13:26-30). He stood up and walked out into the night. It was a fitting moment for Judas to leave. The Messiah truly had come, was seated right next to him, and he would not receive Him.  He left the Bread of life, walked away from the Light of the world, and went into ultimate and utter darkness.

Every time we come to the Table, we also have the opportunity again to receive Jesus Christ, not for salvation this time, but for sanctification. We welcome His fellowship and His presence. We gladly associate ourselves with His body. We publicly pledge our loyalty and love to Him in the light of the special presence promised to His church.

Footnotes

[1] Metonym is a figure of speech. This sentence will illustrate the metonym: “I read Shakespeare.” I am not reading William Shakespeare, the man, but what he wrote. In this case, when I say “Shakespeare,” I don’t mean Shakespeare, but his writings. As this figure of speech applies to the issue of death and shed blood, some, like John MacArthur, say that although shedding of blood was necessary, shed blood is a metonym for death. I believe this evaluation falls short of Scriptural teaching and, in so doing, devalues the shed blood of Christ.

[2] Scripture does not actually mention this kind of whip; this is a historical point.

The Lord’s Table 5

Posted on September 25, 2006 by Jeff Voegtlin

You can’t do that!

Yes, I can.

No. You can’t.

You just watch me!

Have you ever had this conversation? You insist that someone “can’t” do something, and they insist that they can. Yours is a spiritual point of view, theirs, physical. You are saying, “You can’t be happy or successful as a Christian and continue that practice.” They are saying, “I am a Christian and you just watch me!” The same thing is happening in 1 Corinthians 10.

Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table, and of the table of devils. – 1 Corinthians 10:21

While the Corinthians could partake in a pagan ceremony during the week and in the Lord’s supper on Sunday, he states plainly here that they could not partake of both tables.

When Paul uses the title “Lord’s Table” to describe the ordinance of the Lord’s Supper, he introduces an idea that Christians must remember as they partake. He contrasts the cup of the Lord and the cup of devils – the Lord’s Table and the table of devils. To be noticed here is that there are only two cups and tables. Also recognize that we are drinking from one of those cups and eating at one of those tables. There is no such thing as not drinking or partaking. Everyone drinks and partakes of one or the other. In a parallel idea, we cannot serve God and mammon, God and Baal; and in communion, we cannot drink of the cup of the Lord and the cup of devils. We are loyal to one or the other. Christ is not in concord with Belial; there is no agreement between the Temple of the Lord and the temple of idols; there is no fellowship between light and darkness; and there is no partaking of the Lord’s Table and the table of devils.

There is a youth chorus that states, “I want to be more than a Sunday-go-to-meetin’ Christian.” When we approach the Lord’s Table, we are reminded that we demonstrate our loyalty to the Lord at His Table. We cannot serve Satan all week and eat at the Lord’s Table on Sunday. Sure, we can put the elements in our mouth, but God is not fooled – and neither is he mocked. When we partake unworthily, we ask for the judgment of God on our lives – a judgment that was laid on the Corinthian church members physically. We cannot compartmentalize our lives. All of our life is present with us at the Lord’s Table.

The Lord’s Supper is not an island of worship experience that is isolated from the rest of life. It is a sort of “call to arms,” and there is no side called neutral. You are either at His Table or at the Devil’s. If you are not loyal to Him all week, don’t try to eat at His Table on Sunday.

The Lord’s Table is His supper celebrated with thanksgiving in communion with other believers because of our fellowship in Christ. We show loyalty to the Lord as we remember His broken body and shed blood, which washes away our sin.

Bread, Part 2 3

Posted on September 22, 2006 by Dave Mallinak

Bread to the Eater 

Bread has very little value, except to be eaten. Obvious as that is, it is also true. Bread does not make nice decoration at the table. Bread is not aesthetic. It is useful.

That being said, bread adds something to a table that flowers simply can’t. To this author, nothing dresses a table better than warm, fresh bed. Bread offers itself as one of those simple pleasures, extraordinarily ordinary, stunningly plain.

Bread is for eating. The good cook places the bread on the table last. It can cool on the plate. And no need for half-melted butter. Let the bread do the melting. Serve the butter cold. Cut off thick slabs of it and watch it soak into the bread. The first slice won’t survive long. Usually, a second slice is needed before finishing that first plate-full. The main course is for health. The bread, sheer pleasure.

Eating bread is a pleasure. When you have prepared it, it sits, warm and inviting, wanting to be eaten. After all, what other purpose does bread have? It exists to be eaten. You oblige. You pick up the bread and carry it to the mouth. In anticipation, you salivate. You open your mouth to receive the bread. Your teeth grab hold of that first savory bite. Your mouth receives the bread. It chews. The mouth chews until the bread can be swallowed. And all the while, your tongue soaks up the taste. The mouth tastes and sees that the bread is good.

When the mouth finishes with that bite, the tongue, teeth, and esophagus begin the work of swallowing. If you did not swallow, you did not eat. To chew the food and spit it out before swallowing cannot be called eating. The man who chews without swallowing, who spits out the bread before it can be ingested, sins against the bread. He consumes upon his lusts. He didn’t really want the bread. He only wanted the taste. He didn’t want it in him. Maybe he was afraid it would make him fat. Maybe he was afraid it would become him. Maybe he was afraid he would become it. He wanted the pleasure without any commitment. He would not be married, only gratified. Bread is not for tasting. Bread is for eating.

The eater chews and swallows. When he swallows, the eating is complete. He has ingested the bread. He tastes and sees that it is good. Now, he believes it to be health to his naval, marrow to his bones. Man is dust. And unto dust shall we return. But in between, man becomes what he eats. Bread, when ingested, is digested. Miraculously, the body breaks down the bread and distributes it throughout the body. That bread becomes the body, and the body becomes that bread. I in it, and it in me, that we may be one. I become that bread, and that bread becomes me.

The Lord invites me to His banqueting table, and his banner over me is love. He has bread at that table. Bread and a cup. At the Lord’s Table, I take that bread, broken for me. Christ says, take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.

I take that bread. By faith I open my mouth. I place the bread inside. I close my mouth. I chew. I swallow. I do not spit it out. I want it in me. That is faith. Faith is taking, tasting, chewing, swallowing. I hunger for bread. Extraordinary ordinariness. Stunning plainness. It dresses the table like nothing else. I ingest it. I digest it. I am fed. I am full. The bread becomes me.

John 6:56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

Bread is for eating. Eating is faith. Blessed is he that shall eat bread in the kingdom of God.

Why Closed Communion? 34

Posted on September 20, 2006 by Kent Brandenburg

I don’t want to insult your intelligence. I know that the controversy in the topic of communion is the closed, close, and open issue. Controversy has built in heat, hence interest. Who doesn’t want interest in what he writes? And then on one of these hot button subjects, pride could get involved. “I have the best things to say on controversial matters. What I have to say or write will settle the issue.” Doesn’t sound like love is abounding more and more. So, to start I don’t want this to be to stir interest or to write the last word on it. With that being said, I think I’m right in my position, but that will be for you to judge.

Our church once practiced close, that is, we allowed those from churches of like faith and practice to participate with us when visiting. During that period, I was under conviction every time for opening the Table to others outside our church. I thought I was wrong. Why didn’t I change? A few reasons. First, I think it was because I hadn’t studied enough to prove the closed position. Second, I didn’t want to hurt people’s feelings. Third, I assumed that Paul partook when he visited his churches. Fourth, I didn’t think it mattered enough. However, I was still under conviction every time. I’m telling you that now, but I subconsciously didn’t feel they were enough reasons to change.

What convinced me of closed was 1 Corinthians 10:16, 17. Since becoming persuaded, I have been challenged on that several times, and it still works for me in conjunction with a few other texts.

The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.

The bread is the communion (koinonia, “fellowship”) of the body of Christ. Only the body of Christ fellowships at the Lord’s Table. If we practice open or close, we bring people outside of the body into the Lord’s Table. The Lord’s Table, however, is the fellowship of the body of Christ. That’s it. Close and open involve more than the body of Christ, therefore, they do not obey this verse.

This starts with the definition of the body of Christ. That was established in 1 Corinthians 12:27.

Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.

The church at Corinth was the body of Christ. I do not want to confuse the Scriptural understanding of the body of Christ with my practice of the Lord’s Table. I do not want to pervert the right view of fellowship. The Lord’s Table is a communion of each church, not of all believers. I do not want to devalue church membership. We worship God at the Lord’s Table and I want to regulate my worship based upon what God said in His Word. He says that a local church is the body of Christ.

The ordinances were delivered to the local church. Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 11:2:

[K]eep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.

They are church ordinances. If the church is local only, then the Table should be limited to only church members. By including non-church members, we are redefining the church. Misunderstanding the church dishonors God and causes many related problems. The church is designed to keep the truth, so people better know what it is. The ordinances were delivered to the church, so should be exclusive to the church.

What about Paul at Troas in Acts 20? He wasn’t a member there.

When he therefore was come up again, and had broken bread, and eaten, and talked a long while, even till break of day, so he departed (Acts 20:11).

We cannot be sure what “broken bread” is in Acts 20. It may be a meal. Since it is inconclusive, we should follow the clear passage in 1 Corinthians 10. If “broken bread” is the Lord’s Table in Acts 20, then what was Paul doing with a ship full of unbelieving sailors in Acts 27?

33 Paul besought them all to take meat, saying, This day is the fourteenth day that ye have tarried and continued fasting, having taken nothing. 34 Wherefore I pray you to take some meat: for this is for your health: for there shall not an hair fall from the head of any of you. 35 And when he had thus spoken, he took bread, and gave thanks to God in presence of them all: and when he had broken it, he began to eat. 36 Then were they all of good cheer, and they also took some meat. 37 And we were in all in the ship two hundred threescore and sixteen souls. 38 And when they had eaten enough, they lightened the ship, and cast out the wheat into the sea.

Was Paul encouraging unbelievers to take the Lord’s Table with him? Of course not. So “breaking bread” is not always the Lord’s Supper; sometimes it is a meal.

With the absence of any other reason for close communion, we should follow the clear teaching; interpret the less plain in light of the plain. We should practice closed communion. We should exclude the Lord’s Table from everyone except those in the membership of our own church.

Eucharist 4

Posted on September 19, 2006 by Jeff Voegtlin

I’m sure most of you know someone who considers the saying of “grace” to be a mere formality before the “real business” of eating the food starts.  Some of you may wonder why we stop to say “grace” before eating.  After all, doesn’t it lend itself toward empty ritualism or vain repetitions?  While vain repetition and empty ritualism is not the subject of this essay, we may find one response to these questions in the example of our Lord.  Paul tells us,

For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. – 1 Corinthians 11:23-24

Our Lord, in the night of His betrayal, stopped to ευχαριστησας [1].  He gave thanks.  Allow yourself to ponder what He would be “giving thanks” for.  From the several accounts of this event we know that this was the night that He would be betrayed, denied and eventually, forsaken.  Would He give thanks for that?  We also know that soon He would experience extreme anguish and sorrow.  Is that what He gives thanks for?  We know that at this moment He foresees the bodily suffering He will go through.  Is He thankful for that?  I believe His “giving thanks” was more than the often empty ritual that we go through when we bless our food.  The Scriptures do not tell us the words of His thanksgiving, but even if it were a short word of thanks for the bread, Christ knew the significance of that bread.  He followed His thanksgiving by telling His disciples that that bread was His body, which was broken for them.  How could He be thankful for that bread?  —-  How could He not be thankful?  Men (representative of all mankind), who are soon to be freed from the bondage of sin by the sacrifice of His body, surround him.  He gives thanks because a victory is soon to be won.  The greatest victory of the ages is to be won.  This meal is a mixture of emotions.  His body is broken; but that broken body secures the triumph of all time.  The groaning of all creation is silenced in the broken body and shed blood of the Savior.  It is a time for thanksgiving. 

When we approach the Lord’s Supper, we should remember its “eucharistic” qualities.  We should give thanks also.  Our thanksgiving should come from reflection and cause celebration.  We reflect on the broken body of our Lord and remember the pain and suffering He endured.  We remember how He was forsaken by God Himself.  We remember that it was our sin that placed Him there.  And then we remember that His broken body saves us from that sin.  We remember that through His sacrifice Satan is conquered, death is conquered, the world is conquered, sin is conquered.  Christ’s death makes us victors.  In this Supper, we proclaim the Lord’s death.  But this is not the death of defeat; it is a death of dominion.  And for that we give thanks.

Is our celebration of the Lord’s Supper more like a funeral dirge?  It is called a celebration, and it is a time of giving thanks.  It should not be sad.  While it involves reflection and self-examination, it should ultimately be a time of proclaiming the good news of Christ’s conquering death and resurrection.

The Lord’s Supper is His supper celebrated with thanksgiving in communion with other believers because of our fellowship in Christ.  We show loyalty to the Lord’s Table as we remember His broken body and shed blood, which washes away our sin.


 

Footnotes

[1.] eucharistesas – Greek scholars will note that I am not; I know I have mixed my tenses here, sorry. 

  

 

Bread, Part 1 9

Posted on September 15, 2006 by Dave Mallinak

BLESSED ARE THE HUNGRY 

Dinnertime was long past due. At least my dinnertime was long past due. Not that the time for dinner had passed. Just that the time when I needed food had passed. The clock itself would not be striking five o’clock in the evening for another half hour. But the hunger pangs kept growing more intense, until I could feel the headache coming. My wife and I, enjoying an evening downtown, headed to the Italian Restaurant, where we were seated for dinner. “Breadsticks!” I said, “Can we get our breadsticks, please?”

The breadsticks arrived in short order. My wife took one and munched on it, while I devoured the rest of the basket. The warmth that started in my stomach slowly spread itself through my body. The waitress came back to take our order. “Breadsticks!” I said, “Could we get another basket? Please? Before you bring our order?” A few minutes later, a fresh basket of piping hot breadsticks arrived. Once again, my wife ate one while I devoured the entire basket. Finished it, in fact, before the meal arrived.

Nothing fills a hungry man like freshly baked bread, piping hot, right out of the oven. Bread is to me a comfort food, and in my house, no meal is complete without bread. A fresh, homemade loaf is best, but I’ll take biscuits or hot rolls or bread sticks, or even Wonder bread and butter. When I’m hungry, give me bread.

When the Israelites hungered in the wilderness, God gave them bread.

Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat.

This bread fed them, fed them faithfully, and fed them fully. They ate, and they were filled. Manna sustained their lives. But manna cannot sustain life forever. They ate that bread, and they died (John 6:49).

There is bread, The One Bread, which feeds a man so that he will not die.

I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. (John 6:50-51)

The hungry soul craves that bread. The flesh might attempt to satisfy the cravings. Man believes he can live by bread alone. But the flesh cannot meet the need. The world promises to meet that need. Get “dough”, they say. But “dough” cannot meet the need. Religious form sometimes attempts to meet that need. But religion that is mere form and formality cannot satisfy the cravings of a hungry soul.

The manna in the wilderness was not that bread (John 6:32-33). The manna from heaven was a type. The bread of Communion is also a type, not the real thing. You can partake of this bread, and still not eat the Living Bread.

Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

Those who have eaten the Living Bread will desire the bread of Communion. And the bread of Communion will feed us.

The silver tray holds many small pieces of bread. The pieces are many, yet one bread. We pass the tray, we take the bread, we hold it in our hand, and we wait. We pronounce blessing on the bread. We read the words of Christ.

Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.

We place the wafer in our mouth. We chew. We swallow. We are filled. And yet hungry. The wafer is our bread – This is my body. The body of Christ is our bread – and the bread that I will give is my flesh (see I Cor 10:17). The Word made flesh is our bread (Mt. 4:4; Lu 4:4). Give us this day our daily bread.

Jeremiah 15:16 Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.

Believers eat bread. (!)

Building Tool 3

Posted on September 13, 2006 by Kent Brandenburg

It would behoove a blog by the name of JackHammer to recognize a building tool when it sees one.  I can discern saw from screwdriver.  Hammer Time knows tools.  And while you are at it, turn that baseball cap around so the bill is in the front.  It was made to keep the sun out of your eyes.  And when I need to turn a screw, don’t hand me a hammer. Tools have their purpose.  In Matthew 16:18 Jesus told Peter, “I will build my church.”  Jesus said he would build His church.  What tools would He use to do that?

Just as a preliminary, before talking tools, let’s talk terms.  “I will build” is future.  Does that mean that the Lord hadn’t started the church yet?  No.  “I will build” is oikodomeo, which means “I will edify,” so the understanding is “I will build up.”  Only something already started can be built up. Christ will build up His church using different tools.  As we observe the Lord Jesus Christ after Matthew 16:18, we see Him give to the church different tools for the sake of edification.  In Matthew 18, He gives her (the church) church discipline.  Then in Matthew 26 He adds to the church tool box the Lord’s Table. Later He gives the pastor and deacons, sends the Holy Spirit, and more.

Jesus Christ gave the church the Lord’s Table as a tool to build up the church.  He didn’t give this tool to colleges, mission boards, conventions and fellowships, or online forums.  He gave it to His church.  This was a means by which the gates of Hell would not prevail against the church.  Without this instrument of edification, an organization or institution will lack necessary means to function successfully.  In this you will also find the reason why these other non-authoritative, insufficient institutions fall apart.  Of course, with their denigration and destruction goes sound doctrine and practice as well.  However, the church has the Lord’s Table to enable God’s will.

What does the Lord’s Table do for a church?  It is a tool by which a church may purify itself doctrinally and practically on a regular basis.  In the Jerusalem church, purity led to unity led to growth.  Practice and doctrine are inexorably connected.  Practice affects doctrine.  When the tool of the Lord’s Table purifies the practice, it also effectively aids in keeping doctrine right as well.  Jesus commanded the church to keep His Words (John 14:15, 21, 23).  That gets done in part by means of the Lord’s Table.  The Lord’s Table ensures examination.  Members investigate their lives for disobedience to right doctrine and practice.  Constant self-scrutiny results in more discernment.  Discernment is key to keeping a church going in the right direction.  All of this edifies a church.  A church will grow in depth and in breadth. The Lord’s Supper is the tool.